Dental Coding Audits

Dental practices should periodically audit their coding to minimize compliance risk and optimize revenue. Many private payers, Medicaid’s Special Investigative Units (SIU’s), and the Department  of Justice have had recently increased their focus on compliance, especially since children’s dentistry is now covered by the Affordable Care Act, a/k/a “Obamacare”. They are auditing dental practices with greater frequency to detect fraud, waste, and abuse. These compliance audits can lead to large recoupment payments from practices. In our experience, many practices that are caught for fraud aren’t purposefully committing criminal acts, they are simply victims of deficient coding or documentation knowledge. Periodic coding audits will help you catch these deficiencies in your practice’s coding or documentation skills before a payer audit, giving you proper time to fix any issues.

 

Most dental providers never receive proper training in documentation and coding or delegate this task to untrained receptionists. Our audits commonly uncover documentation deficiencies, which can inadvertently lead to lower payments and missed revenue as well as legal exposure. We often identify cases in which providers properly document their services but aren’t coding for every procedure they perform, which can also lead to lower payments.

 

Our years of experience in performing coding and auditing projects as part of dentists’ legal settlements with the Office of the Inspector General and The Department of Justice have given us a deep understanding of both the risks that practices face and the importance of prudent and early action. Accurate coding requires walking a fine line. Your practice wants to optimize revenue by accurately coding for each service rendered, while simultaneously ensuring that your coding and documentation aren’t opening the practice up to any compliance issues. The Coding Network’s dental audits will help you determine just how accurate your coding is and what effect it is having on your compliance risk and revenue cycle.

Latest Blog Posts:

  • GenericFraudHFN_28

Richmond Hospitalist Group Settles Federal FCA Case

June 19th, 2017|Comments Off on Richmond Hospitalist Group Settles Federal FCA Case

Fredericksburg Hospitalist Group, located in Richmond, VA, and fourteen of its member shareholders have agreed to pay nearly $4.2 million to settle a federal FCA case brought under the “qui tam whistleblower” provisions. Dana J. Boente, […]

  • Screen Shot 2017-06-01 at 10.08.11 PM

Medicare Advantage Organization and Former COO to Pay $32.5 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations

June 2nd, 2017|Comments Off on Medicare Advantage Organization and Former COO to Pay $32.5 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations

Freedom Health Inc., a Tampa, Florida-based provider of managed care services, and its related corporate entities (collectively “Freedom Health”), agreed to pay $31,695,593 to resolve allegations that they violated the False Claims Act by engaging […]

  • mount-siani-hospital

Medicare overbilled by $41.9M – Mount Sinai Hospital

May 15th, 2017|Comments Off on Medicare overbilled by $41.9M – Mount Sinai Hospital

New York City: According to a recent OIG report, Mount Sinai Hospital failed to comply with Medicare’s billing requirements for 110 outpatient and inpatient claims reviewed by the office of Inspector General for the audit […]

  • Skin-Cancer-Medical-Center

Dermatologist in Encino to Pay $2.7 Million

April 26th, 2017|Comments Off on Dermatologist in Encino to Pay $2.7 Million

Dr. Norman A. Brooks, M.D., the owner of The Skin Cancer Medical Center in Encino, has paid the United States nearly $2.7 million on April 10th to resolve allegations that he submitted bills to Medicare […]