Why Audit Your Coding
Federal and state statutes make the physician and group practice whose names appear on the claims responsible for “false claims” and any other billing irregularities. CMS has hired independent companies (Recovery Audit Contractors or “RAC”) to review the accuracy of claims on a contingency percentage, or “bounty hunter” basis. The stakes are high, making it incumbent upon each-and-every provider to ensure that regular “arms-length” independent audits are performed to keep their coding accurate. Independent, outside coding audits demonstrate that reasonable steps have been taken to ensure compliance. In the event of an OIG audit, having an “arms-length” independent coding evaluation helps prevent and reduce potential legal and financial compliance exposure. Additionally, the results of independent coding reviews can be utilized as a meaningful teaching tool for the healthcare providers and coding staff.
Accuracy in coding does not solely mean the reduction of compliance exposure. An equally important result of an independent coding review is the identification of opportunities to optimize reimbursement. Coding errors and misconceptions can also result in lost charges and undervalued services. Without outside “peer reviews,” errors, along with whatever else the coder does-not-know becomes institutionalized and can be extremely costly in terms of lost charges and reimbursement over time. No payer will ever send payment for more than was billed because they identified an omitted code. Our audit reports address this by identifying missed charges and undervalued services.
The purpose of coding is to accurately report what happened during the provider-patient encounter. This is totally dependent upon the thoroughness and clarity of the doctors’ medical reports. The codes must reflect the contents of the doctors’ medical records. They are the legal source documents; nurses’ notes, technicians’ notes, and the rest of the chart are secondary to the physicians’ notes and reports. An integral component of our coding accuracy review is to identify any documentation deficiencies or discrepancies in the physicians’ reports that we observe. This feedback helps our clients improve the quality of their medical records, which we feel leads to improved patient care, and also gives the coders more complete and thorough documentation from which to code.
How can having The Coding Network perform periodic coding accuracy audits help your organization:
- Helps with OIG regulations compliance
- Keeps you from paying fines and/or going to jail
- Identifies if you are leaving money on the table
- Ensures you are up to date with coding rules and regulations
- Improves the accuracy of your medical records
- Enables you to better manage your staff
- Serves as a teaching tool for your employees
Latest Blog Posts:
Fredericksburg Hospitalist Group, located in Richmond, VA, and fourteen of its member shareholders have agreed to pay nearly $4.2 million to settle a federal FCA case brought under the “qui tam whistleblower” provisions. Dana J. Boente, […]
Medicare Advantage Organization and Former COO to Pay $32.5 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations
Freedom Health Inc., a Tampa, Florida-based provider of managed care services, and its related corporate entities (collectively “Freedom Health”), agreed to pay $31,695,593 to resolve allegations that they violated the False Claims Act by engaging […]
New York City: According to a recent OIG report, Mount Sinai Hospital failed to comply with Medicare’s billing requirements for 110 outpatient and inpatient claims reviewed by the office of Inspector General for the audit […]