Why Audit Your Coding
Federal and state statutes make the physician and group practice whose names appear on the claims responsible for “false claims” and any other billing irregularities. CMS has hired independent companies (Recovery Audit Contractors or “RAC”) to review the accuracy of claims on a contingency percentage, or “bounty hunter” basis. The stakes are high, making it incumbent upon each-and-every provider to ensure that regular “arms-length” independent audits are performed to keep their coding accurate. Independent, outside coding audits demonstrate that reasonable steps have been taken to ensure compliance. In the event of an OIG audit, having an “arms-length” independent coding evaluation helps prevent and reduce potential legal and financial compliance exposure. Additionally, the results of independent coding reviews can be utilized as a meaningful teaching tool for the healthcare providers and coding staff.
Accuracy in coding does not solely mean the reduction of compliance exposure. An equally important result of an independent coding review is the identification of opportunities to optimize reimbursement. Coding errors and misconceptions can also result in lost charges and undervalued services. Without outside “peer reviews,” errors, along with whatever else the coder does-not-know becomes institutionalized and can be extremely costly in terms of lost charges and reimbursement over time. No payer will ever send payment for more than was billed because they identified an omitted code. Our audit reports address this by identifying missed charges and undervalued services.
The purpose of coding is to accurately report what happened during the provider-patient encounter. This is totally dependent upon the thoroughness and clarity of the doctors’ medical reports. The codes must reflect the contents of the doctors’ medical records. They are the legal source documents; nurses’ notes, technicians’ notes, and the rest of the chart are secondary to the physicians’ notes and reports. An integral component of our coding accuracy review is to identify any documentation deficiencies or discrepancies in the physicians’ reports that we observe. This feedback helps our clients improve the quality of their medical records, which we feel leads to improved patient care, and also gives the coders more complete and thorough documentation from which to code.
How can having The Coding Network perform periodic coding accuracy audits help your organization:
- Helps with OIG regulations compliance
- Keeps you from paying fines and/or going to jail
- Identifies if you are leaving money on the table
- Ensures you are up to date with coding rules and regulations
- Improves the accuracy of your medical records
- Enables you to better manage your staff
- Serves as a teaching tool for your employees
Latest Blog Posts:
The Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services fined eClinicalWorks $132K for violating a 2017 agreement which had required them to report patient safety issues with its EHR in a timely manner.
Read the […]
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) reviewed 191,118 Medicare paid distant-site telehealth claims, totaling $13.8 million, that lacked corresponding originating-site claims. The watchdog agency then reviewed provider supporting documentation of these claims to determine if the services met Medicare’s requirements for reimbursement. 31% of […]
Scholastic and country healing centers will probably observe a cut in Medicare subsidizing if the CMS concludes a proposition to diminish repayment for more-complex patients, as indicated by a Moody’s Investors Service examination discharged Monday.